Annual Report



QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


ý

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 26, 2008

OR

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                                to                                 

Commission file number 000-51642


Aviza Technology, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  20-1979646
(I.R.S. employer
identification number)

440 Kings Village Road
Scotts Valley, California
(Address of principal executive offices)

 

95066
(Zip Code)

831-438-2100
(Registrant's Telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share
(Title of Class)

         Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  o  No  ý

         Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  o  No  ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ý  No  o

         Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  o   Accelerated filer  o   Non-accelerated filer  o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company  ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o  No  ý

         As of March 28, 2008, the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $5,198,616 based on the closing price of the Registrant's common stock reported by the Nasdaq Global Market on that date. Shares of common stock held by officers, directors and holders of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from the calculation because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates on that date. The determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

         The number of shares of the Registrant's common stock outstanding on December 2, 2008 was 21,856,473.

         Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the registrant's 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such definitive proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days subsequent to September 26, 2008.


AVIZA TECHNOLOGY, INC.
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 26, 2008


TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I
ITEM 1.   Business   2
ITEM 1A.   Risk Factors   15
ITEM 1B.   Unresolved Staff Comments   15
ITEM 2.   Properties   15
ITEM 3.   Legal Proceedings   15
ITEM 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders   16

PART II
ITEM 5.   Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities   17
ITEM 6.   Selected Financial Data   18
ITEM 7.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   18
ITEM 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk   30
ITEM 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data   31
ITEM 9.   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure   59
ITEM 9A.   Controls and Procedures   59
ITEM 9B.   Other Information   60

PART III
ITEM 10.   Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance   61
ITEM 11.   Executive Compensation   61
ITEM 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters   61
ITEM 13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence   61
ITEM 14.   Principal Accountant Fees and Services   61

PART IV
ITEM 15.   Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules   62
SIGNATURES   66
SCHEDULE II   68

1



Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

         The statements in this report include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our management's current expectations and beliefs and involve numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. You should not rely upon these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events because we cannot assure you that the events or circumstances reflected in these statements will be achieved or will occur. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology, including the words "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should," "seeks," "intends," "plans," "estimates" or "anticipates" or the negative of these words and phrases or other variations of these words and phrases or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things: our sales, results of operations and anticipated cash flows; capital expenditures; depreciation and amortization expenses; research and development expenses; sales, general and administrative expenses; the development and timing of the introduction of new products and technologies; our ability to maintain and develop relationships with our existing and potential future customers and our ability to maintain the level of investment in research and development and capacity that is required to remain competitive. Many factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to: variability of our revenues and financial performance; risks associated with product development and technological changes; the acceptance of our products in the marketplace by existing and potential future customers; disruption of operations or increases in expenses due to our involvement in litigation or caused by civil or political unrest or other catastrophic events; general economic conditions and conditions in the semiconductor industry in particular and the continued employment of our key personnel and risks associated with competition.

         For a discussion of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements, see the "Liquidity and Capital Resources" section under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Item 7 of Part II of this report and the other risks and uncertainties that are set forth elsewhere in this report or detailed in our other Securities and Exchange Commission reports and filings. We assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements.


PART I

ITEM 1.    Business

Company Overview

        We design, manufacture, sell and support advanced semiconductor capital equipment and process technologies for the global semiconductor industry and related markets. Our systems are used in a variety of segments of the semiconductor market, including advanced silicon processing for memory logic devices, advanced 3-D packaging, MEMS, LED, compound semiconductors and power integrated circuits, or ICs, for communications. We focus our efforts on designing systems that enable device manufacturers to meet today's challenging technological and manufacturing requirements. We offer both front-end-of-line and back-end-of-line systems and process technologies used for the aforementioned markets addressing critical thin film formation technologies, including atomic layer deposition, or ALD, physical vapor deposition, or PVD, chemical vapor deposition, or CVD and plasma etch, or Etch, and thermal processing systems.

        Our customer base is geographically diverse and includes both integrated device manufacturers and foundry-based manufacturers. We have a broad installed base, with approximately 2,500 systems in active operation for which we are providing ongoing parts and service worldwide. We believe that these systems are installed at many of the world's semiconductor manufacturers, including a majority of the top 25 semiconductor manufacturers around the world. We sell our systems globally primarily through a direct sales force and in some instances through local independent sales representatives. Our global sales and support organization is focused on developing and nurturing long-term customer

2



relationships. Our largest customers by net sales for our fiscal year ended September 26, 2008 were Win Semiconductor, Inc., Qimonda AG, Triquint Semiconductor Corporation, ST Microelectronics and Infineon Technologies AG.

Industry Overview

        Modern electronic devices are the fundamental building blocks used in all electronic systems, playing an important role in the proliferation of computing, communications and consumer electronics products. The market for semiconductor and related devices has expanded rapidly over recent decades as device manufacturers have produced ICs and other devices, such as 3D-ICs, gaining rapid adoption with increased functionality and increasingly smaller sizes at lower costs.

        VLSI Research Incorporated (VLSI), reports that worldwide semiconductor sales are expected to reach $237.4 billion in 2009 and expects sales to reach $356.5 billion in 2013. Growth in the IC industry has been driven both by the development of new electronic products as well as an increase in the silicon content of applications for the automotive, consumer, communication and computing industries. As these electronic products have become more sophisticated, memory ICs in particular have experienced rapid growth as the need to support increased memory capacity in these products has increased. Memory ICs are available in many different types, including dynamic random access memory, or DRAM, and flash memory, to serve a variety of different memory requirements. According to VLSI, both DRAM and flash memory sales are projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of more than 11.9% from 2009 through 2013. 3D-IC wafers using TSV technology have numerous applications, including NAND Flash Memory, image sensors, sensors and DSP, DRAM, SRAM, FPGA and memory, processors, amplifiers for wireless LAN, communication for mobile phones and military applications. Market research firm Yole Développement forecasts the compounded annual growth rate for 3D-IC wafers to be above 60% by 2012.

        The design and manufacture of semiconductor devices involve a complex and capital-intensive multi-step process. This process involves different types of capital equipment used to manufacture, assemble and test these devices. For example, to build an IC, transistors are first created on a wafer, such as silicon, by performing a series of steps involving deposition, patterning and selective removal of unwanted layers. Interwoven within these steps are multiple thermal treatments to stabilize or activate various layers. These early fabrication process steps are typically called front-end-of-line processing. Following front-end-of-line processing, the transistors are microscopically wired together through the formation of interconnected metal layers and insulating dielectric materials, known as back-end-of-line processing. Each process step, which may be performed multiple times, is subject to a tightly controlled series of chemical, deposition, thermal and lithographic processes in order to yield a fully functional IC and related devices such as MEMS.

Industry Challenges

        Semiconductor designers and manufacturers are under increasing pressure to bring high-quality and increasingly complex devices to market faster and at lower cost. They must also continue to improve device performance while controlling or minimizing capital expenditures. This becomes more critical as cost-effective scaling presents significant challenges. As a result, device companies are beginning to rely heavily on non-scaling techniques such as new film materials and new device structures to deliver improved device performance. Capital equipment plays an important role in enabling device designers and manufacturers to lower their overall costs, get products to market quickly and improve the products' quality and reliability. As a direct result of the increasing pressure placed on designers and manufacturers to keep pace with Moore's Law, which predicts that for minimum component cost the number of transistors on an IC doubles every 24 months, capital equipment suppliers are facing new challenges in meeting their needs.

3


        The key challenges that capital equipment manufacturers like Aviza must address include:

         Integrated Through Silicon Via, or TSV, Technologies vs. Advanced Packaging —The rapid adoption of advanced packaging techniques, which are commonly referred to as wafer level packaging, package-on-package, package-in-package or 3-D packaging, is fueled by the drive for continuous improvement in device performance and functionality in wireless, personal and consumer electronics such as mobile phones, MP3 players and radio frequency identification tags. In addition to the increasing demand for improved performance, IC designers and manufacturers have to deliver improved performance in a smaller overall package and with lower cost. The inherent physical constraints of traditional wire-bonding interconnect schemes create a practical limit on the ability to improve performance while simultaneously reducing size.

        The semiconductor industry continues to strive to meet the demands for improved performance, in a smaller overall package, at lower cost. Traditionally, this demand has been fueled by the industry's desire to keep pace with Moore's Law, coupled with stacking dies one on top of the other and using traditional wire bonding techniques to accomplish the die-to-die and die-to-substrate connect. However, there are physical and performance (primarily resistance capacitance constant) limitations to being able to stack dies and still meet the input/output, or I/O, requirements with wire bonding techniques.

        To achieve higher I/O and lower cost performance, the industry is investing in alternative means of stacking dies and creating interconnect approaches that minimize or eliminate traditional wire bonding techniques, one of which is the use of TSV interconnect structures. According to TechSearch International, Inc., there are over 40 companies with TSV activities. This advancement of TSV activities is a means of keeping pace with Moore's Law. Research and development and pilot line programs are common in the integrated device manufacturing, foundry and packaging manufacturers. We believe that Aviza is one of a few semiconductor capital equipment suppliers that have all of the requisite technologies in our product portfolio to create TSVs.

         New Materials —In order to keep pace with the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), the semiconductor industry is faced with the need to develop and adopt an unprecedented number of new materials, as the physical properties of conventional materials are reaching limitations in their ability to provide improved performance. New materials such as high dielectric constant materials, or high-k dielectrics, and metal electrodes are required to increase device performance.

         Lower Cost of Ownership —In order to improve their cost structure, device manufacturers demand processing platforms with lower total cost of ownership, which takes into account not only the initial purchase price but also throughput, yield, reliability, flexibility and other operating costs.

         Time-to-Market —Today's devices are characterized by rapid technological improvements and shorter product life cycles. These product life cycles are accelerated for devices used in consumer electronics products such as mobile phones and digital cameras, given the constant innovation in the consumer electronics industry, which poses additional challenges for semiconductor manufacturers and capital equipment suppliers.

Our Solutions

        We deliver a broad range of semiconductor capital equipment and process technologies to serve the needs of a wide range of integrated device manufacturers (IDMs) and packaging manufacturers. In addition to providing the high product performance expected by our customers, we believe maintaining

4



the quality standards of our organization and our worldwide service and support are important to meeting these needs. We believe our customers choose our products because of the following factors:

         Advanced Film Development and Process Technology —Our continued development of process technologies, such as our ALD systems and TSV technology, enables semiconductor manufacturers to use new materials necessary to manufacture and package next-generation devices.

         Worldwide Customer Service and Support —Our goal is to provide our customers with global technical service, in-depth process engineering support and rapid delivery of our systems and parts. We provide customer support through our global service organization 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. In addition, we have multiple parts depots around the world to support our installed base of systems.

         Focus on Customer Relationships and Strategic Alliance —We believe that our regular dialogue with our customers and our visibility into their technology roadmaps allow us to serve their needs effectively. We also work to develop strategic alliances with equipment and materials suppliers to the semiconductor industry to produce next-generation films and processes to keep pace with the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors.

         Low Cost of Ownership —Our systems are designed to improve the yield, throughput and utilization of semiconductor manufacturing facilities. Our systems offer integrated process technology, extendibility and optimized process flow to help IC makers achieve their overall cost-of-ownership and functionality objectives.

Our Strategy

        Our objective is to be a leading provider of advanced capital equipment and process technologies to semiconductor manufacturers in our served markets. To achieve this objective, our strategy is comprised of the following elements:

    Provide our customers with a broad range of technologies such as our ALD, CVD, Etch and PVD systems in our served markets and in applications where we believe our products deliver a technical advantage;

    Expand our customer base in the Micro-Electro-Mechanical systems (MEMS), LED, compound semiconductor (III-V) and Power IC markets with Etch, CVD and PVD systems. Continue our penetration in the 3D interconnect arena (employing Through Silicon Via, or TSV, technology) using our integrated solution for research and development;

    Expand our customer base in the memory and logic markets with our ALD systems;

    Further penetrate our existing customer base by seeking opportunities to sell our customers systems from our expanding portfolio of systems that they are not already purchasing from us; and

    Continue to provide service, upgrades, spare parts and ongoing support for the large global installed base of large batch thermal systems, while retaining the capability to manufacture those systems when customers require additional systems.

Systems, Markets and Applications

Deposition

        Deposition involves the application of thin films in advanced device manufacturing. Chemical reactions form deposited films between gaseous reactants at an elevated temperature in the vicinity and on the surface of a wafer. Deposited films can be either crystalline or non-crystalline and can be either insulators or metals. Variations of deposition processes include ALD, PVD, CVD, plasma-enhanced

5



chemical vapor deposition, or PECVD, atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition, or APCVD, and low pressure chemical vapor deposition, or LPCVD.

         Atomic Layer Deposition —The reduction in the size of devices continues to keep pace with Moore's Law, driving stringent requirements for the thickness control and repeatability of deposited films used in the manufacturing of devices. With decreasing geometries and increasing aspect ratios, we believe that ALD will replace some of the incumbent deposition techniques due to ALD's ability to achieve uniform thickness, which is commonly referred to as conformal step coverage, across the horizontal and vertical planes of the device structure. This method allows the deposition of a wide variety of dielectric and conductive films one atomic layer at a time for various sub-90 nanometer (nm) memory and logic applications.

        Both conventional PVD and CVD systems have limitations with respect to creating films with less thickness at the bottom of trench structures as compared to flat structures. ALD overcomes these limitations by depositing a single atomic layer at a time which covers the entire surface of the wafer independent of the surface features with the intent of achieving nearly 100% conformal step coverage in the most challenging memory structures with aspect ratios greater than 60 to 1.

        The uniformity requirements for sub-100nm technologies pose a serious challenge to current deposition techniques. For example, the uniformity requirements for a 1nm film are plus or minus one-half of an angstrom, which is a unit of measure equal to one ten-billionth of a meter, across a 300mm wafer. We believe that ALD has the process capability to achieve this level of precise control with the repeatability required for high-volume manufacturing.

        We believe that ALD is also best suited to deposit high-k materials, which can meet the lower electrical leakage uniformity, conformal step coverage and material purity requirements for nanotechnology. The deposition temperatures for ALD are hundreds of degrees lower than conventional CVD processes. We offer a single-wafer ALD system to address a variety of applications, film thickness and productivity requirements.

        Our Celsior f xP™ ALD system is a single-wafer, multi chamber cluster solution configurable to both 200mm and 300mm wafer sizes and is designed to meet current process and productivity requirements with capabilities beyond the 90nm node. Our Celsior f xP system is designed to offer precise atomic-level thickness control, low process temperature and highly conformal coatings with film quality for a wide range of films, including aluminum oxide, hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, hafnium silicate, titanium nitride, tantalum nitride and zirconium oxide.

         Physical Vapor Deposition —PVD is a process used to apply conducting, liner and barrier metal layers on an IC. One of the primary PVD methods is sputtering, a process in which an electric discharge creates ions of an inert gas, such as argon, which are then accelerated in a vacuum at a target typically composed of pure metal or a metal compound, such as aluminum, tantalum or copper. The target atoms are sputtered away and deposited on the wafer to form a thin film. Thin conductive films, when patterned by lithography and etching, are used to wire an IC.

        Our Sigma f xP™ system is used to sputter uniform layers of pure metals or metal alloys and metal compounds such as oxides or nitrides. Sigma f xP couples unique process modules on a cluster tool architecture and is designed to achieve lower cost of ownership. Sigma f xP is designed to be one of the cleanest PVD systems on the market, which is a key technology requirement for sputtering high quality films on the wafer. The process chambers are designed around a simple base configuration that can be modified via application-specific kits to address a wide range of device needs. In particular, the process modules are scalable to create advanced capability PVD chambers for depositing high quality barrier and liner layers for advanced metallization structures. These consist of the "long throw" Hi-Fill and "ionized metal" Advanced Hi-Fill PVD chambers for improved barrier and liner deposition into high aspect ratio structures. Where conformal step coverage over high aspect ratio features is critical, a

6



metal organic CVD module is available to provide low temperature, largely conformal titanium nitride films. Pre-heat and sputter etch chambers are also available.

        Our Sigma f xP system supports both interconnect applications on the front side of the wafer and solder metal applications on the back side of the wafer for the growing power device market. Our Sigma f xP system also addresses aluminum nitride deposition for bulk acoustic wave, or BAW, devices for next-generation communication products. BAW devices require uniform deposition of piezoelectric films. We have developed significant intellectual property in this area.

         Chemical Vapor Deposition —CVD is a process that can be used to apply thin films of dielectric and, to a lesser extent, conductive materials. During the CVD process, gases that contain atoms of the material to be deposited chemically react to form a thin film of solid material on the wafer. Typical uses for dielectric deposition by CVD include:

    Shallow trench isolation, or STI, to isolate one transistor from another;

    The pre-metal dielectric, or PMD, the insulating layer between the active components and the first interconnect metal layer;

    The inter-metal dielectric, or IMD, the insulating layer between the different metal layers; and

    The final passivation layer that seals the completed device from atmospheric moisture.

        Our Delta f xP™ system can be configured with up to six process modules to address different applications and markets, offering enhanced throughput, uptime and productivity. Process modules are based upon a standard design that allows migration between platforms as capacity demand increases. Key applications for the Delta f xP include STI, PMD and IMD.

        Silicon dioxide, when deposited by conventional techniques, displays small gaps inside the structure, which prevents effective film planarization. Our planar processes (previously referred to as Flowfill and low-k Flowfill processes), which are performed on the Delta f xP, are CVD technologies that were developed to form high-quality silicon dioxide layers that possess the properties both to fill gaps and produce a high degree of planarization. Planar processes reduce the need for chemical mechanical planarization processing with a corresponding reduction in cost of ownership, or in some cases completely remove the chemical mechanical planarization steps.

         Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition —PECVD is a form of deposition that utilizes plasma to enhance the chemical reaction rates of precursors, or the chemical ingredients that react with other ingredients to produce a thin film. PECVD processing allows deposition at lower temperatures, which is often required for the proper application of certain films. This deposition technique was developed to allow for low temperature processing of silicon nitride films for passivation and insulation of devices.

        Our Delta i2L cluster system is capable of processing wafers up to 200mm in size and produces high-quality dielectric films for use in compound semiconductor, silicon analog and mixed-signal devices. A low temperature deposition process offers high-quality silicon nitride films for use as on-chip capacitor dielectrics. The dense nitride films have low hydrogen content and exhibit improved electrical performance when used in capacitors on an IC, allowing device manufacturers to use thinner capacitor dielectrics, while maintaining reliability. In addition to the capacitor dielectric process, the system also comes equipped with a suite of standard nitride and oxide process recipes.

         Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition —APCVD is the process by which chemicals are applied to the wafer in an atmospherically controlled environment. Our APCVD systems employ our proprietary approach designed to allow high deposition rates with a simpler reactor design yielding higher operational reliability and high wafer throughput.

7


        Our APCVD systems include:

    1500 APCVD —Our 1500 APCVD system processes 200mm wafers addressing design-rule fabrication capability of 0.15 micron. It offers relatively low cost of ownership with a process designed to result in improved reliability, performance and serviceability through enhanced film uniformity, reduced consumables, improved system availability and ultra-low film metal levels. Our 1500 APCVD system provides both doped and un-doped deposition of tetraethylorthosilicate-, or TEOS-, based silicon dioxide and can be utilized in a broad range of dielectric film applications for both logic and memory manufacturing requirements;

    1000 APCVD —Our 1000 APCVD system offers either hybrid or TEOS-reactant processes and is designed for high productivity on 200mm wafer processing lines. It provides both doped and un-doped deposition of TEOS-based silicon dioxide and can be used in a broad range of dielectric film applications for a variety of semiconductor applications; and

    999R APCVD and TEOS999 APCVD —Our 999R APCVD and TEOS999 APCVD systems are for production lines employing between 100mm and 150mm wafers and are capable of simultaneously processing two wafers in parallel. Both systems offer doped and un-doped silicon dioxide processing capabilities.

Etch

        Etch is a process that preferentially removes material from the wafer surface by chemically converting exposed portions of the surface into a gaseous by-product that is pumped away from the process chamber. Almost all deposition processes create a film covering the entire wafer surface. While many layers of different material are required to build up a device, the materials are only needed in selected parts of the wafer during the IC manufacturing process. For example, to create the current carrying "wires" of an IC, the entire wafer surface is covered with sputtered aluminum alloys and its associated barrier layers. These conductive layers are then coated with light-sensitive films, which are commonly referred to as photoresist, and are exposed to the wiring pattern during the photolithography process. Plasma etching is then used to remove the exposed conductive layer, thus replicating the wiring pattern. The metal remains in place under the photoresist, which is then stripped off. The finished metal lines at that point in the device manufacturing process are referred to as the interconnects.

        Our Etch systems include:

    Omega fxP™ —The Omega f xP offers up to six process modules plus in-line stations to allow for the alignment and the cooling down of the wafer. The cluster module also has two vacuum cassette stations and multiple chambers, which provide high throughput for the high volume user or the option to "mix and match" different plasma sources for advanced sequential etching processes.

    Omega i2L —The Omega i2L features our plasma source technologies in a single-chamber format that combines high performance etching with small footprint and low initial capital cost for low-rate production fabrication facilities. These attributes make the Omega i2L particularly well suited for cost-sensitive manufacturing of ICs and compound semiconductors.

        Both the Omega f xP and the Omega i2L support our three main plasma sources: our M0RI™ etch technology, Plasma Enhanced Reactive Ion Etch, or PERIE, and Inductively Coupled Plasma, or ICP. Additional modules may also be added to the main transport modules that provide secondary functions such as post-etch corrosion removal processes. In our etch systems suite, M0RI offers the highest plasma density that provides process solutions for the most advanced polysilicon, oxide and low-k etch requirements. The low plasma density ICP is used extensively for high-density aluminum and polysilicon etching as well as for a broad range of processing on the front and back sides of compound semiconductors. The PERIE offers medium plasma density for silicon and dielectric etching where the

8



feature sizes are less challenging. We have also developed a variant of our M0RI etch process chamber specifically for very high aspect ratio silicon etching and micro machining. This deep silicon, or DSi, chamber offers benefits to production users in system-in-package, wafer level packaging and conventional micro-electro-mechanical systems applications. DSi techniques are used in a myriad of applications such as the manufacture of discrete components in system-in-package and accelerometers for car air bags. We also offer a gas phase etch module, which removes sacrificial layers to create microscopic moveable structures.

Batch Thermal Processing

        Wafers are subjected to intense heat that can take a wafer from room temperature to temperatures ranging from 100°C to 1200°C. Thermal processing systems, commonly referred to as furnaces, work with either low pressure, for deposition, or atmospheric, for oxidation and diffusion, conditions. LPCVD is used to deposit either a conductive non-metal film such as doped polysilicon or an insulator film such as silicon nitride. Wafers are loaded into thermal processing systems in batches of 50 to 150 wafers. The heating process may be used to modify the properties of deposited films, reactively grow various films, such as oxide, or modify the conductive properties of a silicon wafer.

        Our thermal processing systems include:

    RVP-300plus ™—Our RVP-300 plus is designed for processing 300mm wafers addressing requirements for 0.13-micron and smaller geometries. The design of the RVP-300 plus focuses on maximizing productivity and throughput. Among its features, the RVP-300 plus is capable of rapidly ramping the temperature up and down, which results in chemical deposition and temperature control across the wafer. The RVP-300 plus also utilizes a dual-cassette configuration resulting in increased throughput;

    RVP-550 ™—Our RVP-550 is a flexible batch heating system with Across-Flow technology and is designed to process loads up to 100 wafers. Our Across-Flow technology generates a virtual single-wafer environment intended to result in improved process performance. We believe that the RVP-550 is well suited for advanced technology applications in a high product mix manufacturing process typically found at an advanced foundry customer;

    RVP-200 —Our RVP-200, which is based on the AVP platform discussed below, processes both eight-inch and six-inch wafers and meets 0.18-micron technology requirements. The RVP-200 features a design that enables it to ramp up and ramp down temperatures between two to ten times faster than the AVP platform and offers faster throughput and tighter junction depth control. By utilizing the AVP platform features such as 16-cassette wafer handling and advanced temperature control, the RVP-200 is designed to offer the same advanced reliability as our AVP systems; and

    AVP-200 —Our AVP-200 is a vertical furnace designed to meet the eight-inch and six-inch wafer requirements of sub-0.25 micron processing. The AVP-200 single-tube system includes advanced process control, data acquisition software, advanced automation, a proprietary process chamber design and an option for atmospheric control within the wafer handling area. Key features of the AVP system include storage capacity for sixteen 25-wafer cassettes, or a total of 400 wafers, and advanced temperature control for accurate wafer temperature regulation. We designed the AVP system to offer customers a low cost of ownership through high productivity and a small footprint.

Integrated Through Silicon Via (TSV) Formation

        The continuing trend in the consumer electronics industry is to develop smaller, more portable devices that allow multiple functions. Many handheld devices are now capable of various functions,

9



including voice communication, Internet access, email, video, MP3 and GPS, among others. The challenge faced by designers of these products is to continue the trend that each new generation of devices be smaller and support additional functions at a higher level of performance than the preceding model. The semiconductor industry plays a critical role in enabling the product evolution process by developing new, innovative ways of increasing functionality in a smaller overall device package, but at the same time maintaining or reducing the overall cost of the completed chip set. 3D-ICs are an important part of this innovation.

        For research and development and pilot production, the ideal embodiment of the integrated TSV process solution is a single toolset capable of all three critical, individual process steps in TSV formation: TSV etch, CVD liner & liner etch and PVD. The unique advantage of such an approach would provide an opportunity for TSV development time to be shortened dramatically.

        With all three process technologies, Etch, PVD and CVD, a single system would have a much smaller footprint, compared to three individual systems, and a single install, minimizing cost and disruption to the clean room, thus reducing the overall time to produce the first wafer. In addition, this type of system would allow research and development users to link separate processes without existing the vacuum environment in order to discover potential performance benefits, and then apply those findings to optimally configure production systems. This would be impossible on traditionally configured single-process systems.

        Since all three processes interact with each other, the user is best served by having one supplier in control of Etch, CVD and PVD. An installation where three separate vendors are involved will inevitably introduce delays with each vendor taking responsibility only for its own process. We believe that the shortest time-to-market will be best achieved by a single vendor taking responsibility for all steps.

        Aviza has developed the Versalis f xP, which we believe is the first system to integrate the required TSV processes onto a single platform.

        Our Integrated TSV System:

    Versalis f xP™—The Versalis f xP is a production-proven single-wafer platform. Its individual modules such as deep silicon etch, PVD and CVD have been proven in high-volume manufacturing for various applications, including wafer-level packaging, MEMS and power semiconductors. The Versalis f xP is a single-wafer 200/300 mm cluster system that integrates multiple processes (including Etch, PVD and CVD) on one platform. Targeted for advanced research and development activities for 3D-IC devices, Versalis f xP offers a route for customers to develop their TSV technology and easily migrate their processes to high-volume production. This "one-stop shop" solution enables customers to save money by investing in less capital equipment for research and development, minimize installation costs and make efficient use of manufacturing floor space.

Sales, Marketing and Customer Support

        We sell, install and service our systems for our global device manufacturing customers with the aim of providing viable manufacturing solutions for their existing technological needs, as well as establishing long-term business relationships to support their next-generation products. Our experienced sales personnel have the knowledge to address the technical benefits and economic advantages of our systems. Our sales organization is tightly integrated with our service and support organization, which we believe allows us to understand our customers' needs better and to tailor solutions to meet those needs.

10


        Our sales are distributed among three geographic regions that include North America, Europe and Asia Pacific. The following table illustrates the geographic distribution of our net sales for the fiscal years ended September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007:

Fiscal   North America   Europe   Asia Pacific  
2008     23%     28%     49%  
2007     17%     22%     61%  

        In North America, our systems are marketed and sold through our direct sales and service organization in Scotts Valley, California. In Europe, our systems are marketed and sold primarily through our direct sales and service operations in France, Germany, Israel and the United Kingdom, as well as Italy, where we use a local sales representative. In the Asia Pacific region, we use direct sales and service and agency arrangements. We have offices within the Asia Pacific region in China, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan.

        In order to demonstrate the capability of our systems, we engage customers during the research and development cycle. We have occasionally provided our newest generation systems to our customers for evaluation. The average duration of an evaluation period for systems provided to our customers is typically less than one year. As we expand our sales efforts globally, particularly with new systems and in emerging markets, we believe that ongoing and continued investment in demonstration and evaluation systems will be important to our future business.

        We believe that a comprehensive global support program is critical to providing sustained value to our customers and maintaining customer loyalty. As a result, we maintain an experienced central customer support group in addition to regional based service and support staff around the world at local centers, who are in close proximity to customers and provide comprehensive local support programs intended to ensure that our systems are operating in optimal fashion.

Customers

        Our customer base is diverse, both geographically and in terms of the types of devices that our customers produce. Customers for our systems include several of the world's top semiconductor manufacturers and foundry makers. We have a broad installed base, with approximately 2,500 systems in active operation for which we are providing ongoing parts and services worldwide.

        Our customers are primarily IC manufacturers. The IC industry is cyclical and has experienced significant fluctuations, and our sales are impacted by broad industry trends. Moreover, we have a highly concentrated customer base. For our fiscal year ended September 26, 2008, one customer, Win Semiconductor Corp., accounted for 16% of our net sales and approximately 57% of our net sales in fiscal 2008 were attributable to our top ten customers. For our fiscal year ended September 28, 2007, two customers, Inotera Memories Inc. and Nan Ya Technology Corp., accounted for 29% and 12% of our net sales, respectively, and approximately 67% of our net sales in fiscal 2007 were attributable to our top ten customers. Our largest customers may vary from year to year depending upon, among other things, our customers' annual budget for capital expenditures, plans for new fabrication facilities and expansions and new system introductions by us. We expect to continue to receive a substantial portion of our net sales from a small number of customers for the foreseeable future.

Backlog

        As of September 26, 2008, our backlog was approximately $17.0 million, as compared to approximately $19.9 million as of September 28, 2007. Our backlog consists of both system and spare part purchase orders from our customers that provide for typical delivery within 12 months. Backlog attributable to systems not yet shipped includes only systems for which we have received a purchase order and have assigned a delivery date. Orders are typically subject to cancellation or delay by the

11



customer with no penalty. Because of possible changes in delivery schedules and cancellations of orders, our backlog at any particular point in time is not necessarily representative of actual sales for any succeeding periods, nor is backlog any assurance that we will realize profit from completing these orders.

Research, Development and Engineering

        Modern electronic devices are subject to significant and rapid changes in technologies in order to remain competitive. We and other semiconductor equipment suppliers are subject to the demands that these rapid technological changes impose in relation to new system introductions and continual improvements and enhancements to existing systems. As a result, we strive to design and continually improve low-cost systems that have high throughput, flexibility and scalability and are efficient to manufacture and easy to support. Close working relationships between our key customers and our engineering teams enable us to incorporate our customers' feedback and needs into our system development efforts. We intend to continue to make substantial investments in strategic research and development both in personnel utilization and financial terms.

        We focus our research and development activities on developing applications for our ALD, PVD, CVD, Etch and thermal systems. During recent periods, we have devoted significant resources to developing advanced thin films for dielectrics and capacitors. Our research and development expenditures during fiscal 2008 and 2007 were $29.9 million and $31.9 million, respectively.

Manufacturing, Raw Materials and Supplies

        Our principal manufacturing operations consist of assembly, systems integration and testing at our facilities in Scotts Valley, California and Newport, Wales, U.K. We focus our internal manufacturing efforts on those precision mechanical and electro-mechanical assemblies that we believe differentiate our systems from those of our competitors. We outsource the manufacture of many of our non-critical subassemblies to a number of key suppliers. We attempt to maintain close relationships with these suppliers and to develop qualified alternative suppliers in the event that we lose access to existing suppliers in an effort to reduce cost. Effective component procurement is critical to the quality, manufacturing cycle time and cost of our systems.

        In the past year, we have improved our global supply chain and reduced our material costs. These efforts have resulted in gross margin improvements. Continuous improvement in our supply chain is one of our key strategic initiatives. In addition, our single platform architecture utilizes common design elements, components and subsystems. This results in our ability to maintain lower inventory levels and obtain better prices for the higher volumes of parts that we buy.

        Certain components used in our systems are purchased from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Although we believe that all single-source components are currently available in adequate numbers, we cannot assure you that shortages will not develop in the future.

Competition

        Our markets are competitive and characterized by rapidly changing technology. We believe that the primary competitive factors in our markets are:

    system performance and reliability;

    initial sales price;

    total cost of ownership;

    ability to manufacture and deliver systems on a timely basis;

12


    ability to meet customer specifications; and

    global customer technical service and support.

        We believe that we compete effectively with our competitors with respect to each of these factors. Our ability to remain competitive will depend to a great extent upon our ongoing performance in the areas of system development and customer support. To be successful in the future, we believe that we must respond promptly and effectively to the challenges of technological change and our competitors' innovations by continually enhancing our system offerings.

        Our principal competitors include Applied Materials, Inc., Tokyo Electron LTD, ASM International N.V., Kokusai Semiconductor Equipment Corporation and IPS, Ltd. Some of our competitors have substantially greater financial resources and more extensive engineering, manufacturing, marketing and customer support capabilities than we do. We expect our competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and to introduce new products or new technologies. In addition, we anticipate that competitive pressures may cause continued price-based competition.

Intellectual Property

        We rely on a combination of patents, patent applications, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements to establish and protect our proprietary rights. As of September 26, 2008, we held 113 U.S. and 170 foreign patents. Our issued patents and any subsequently issued patents arising from our pending applications will expire between 2008 and 2027.

        We also rely on technical know-how and other unpatented proprietary information relating to the development and manufacturing of our systems. We seek to protect our trade secrets and proprietary information, in part, by requiring our employees to enter into agreements obligating them to maintain confidentiality and to assign to us the rights to inventions that they make while in our employment. We also enter into non-disclosure agreements with our consultants and suppliers to protect confidential information delivered to them.

        There has been significant litigation in the semiconductor equipment industry involving patents and other intellectual property rights. Infringement claims may be asserted against us in the future and, if such claims are made, we may not be able to defend against such claims successfully or, if necessary, obtain licenses on reasonable terms. Any claim that our systems infringe the proprietary rights of others would force us to defend ourselves and possibly our customers against the alleged infringement. These claims and any resulting lawsuit, if successful, could subject us to significant liability for damages and invalidate our proprietary rights. These lawsuits, regardless of their outcome, would likely be time-consuming and expensive to resolve and would divert management's time and attention. Any potential intellectual property litigation could force us to do one or more of the following:

    lose or forfeit proprietary rights;

    stop manufacturing or selling systems that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;

    obtain from the owner of the infringed intellectual property right a license to sell or use the relevant technology, which license may not be available on reasonable terms or at all and may involve significant royalty payments;

    pay damages and attorneys' fees in some circumstances; or

    redesign those systems that use the challenged intellectual property.

        In addition, in the normal course of business, we periodically receive and make inquiries regarding possible patent infringement. In dealing with such inquiries, it may become necessary or useful for us to obtain or grant licenses or other rights. We cannot assure you that such licenses or rights will be

13



available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we are not able to resolve a claim, negotiate a settlement or obtain necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms or successfully prosecute or defend our position, it could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Employees

        As of September 26, 2008, we had 491 employees, of which 226 were located in Europe, 103 were located in Asia and 162 were located in North America. Of our total employees, 99 were principally dedicated to research and development, 126 were dedicated to sales and general and administrative, 162 were dedicated to customer service, applications and service and support and 104 were dedicated to manufacturing.

        We consider our relationship with our employees to be good. None of our employees are represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and we have never experienced a work stoppage, slowdown or strike.

Facilities

        We maintain our headquarters in Scotts Valley, California, where we own a 213,000-square foot facility. We also operate a leased 103,000-square foot manufacturing and engineering facility in Newport, Wales, U.K. We believe that our facilities in the U.S. and U.K. provide sufficient manufacturing capacity for the foreseeable future.

        In addition, we lease a number of smaller properties and field offices located in France, Germany, China, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan.

Environmental Matters

        We operate semiconductor applications laboratories and manufacturing facilities in Scotts Valley, California and Newport, South Wales, U.K. and are subject to federal, state and local regulations governing the use of hazardous materials.

        Our Scotts Valley property is a federally listed Superfund site. Chlorinated solvent and other contamination was identified at the site in the early 1980s, and by the late 1980s, Watkins Johnson Corporation, or Watkins Johnson (now WJ Communications, Inc.), a predecessor to the Thermal Division of ASML Holdings, N.V., our Predecessor, had installed a groundwater extraction and treatment system. In 1991, Watkins Johnson entered into a consent decree with the United States Environmental Protection Agency providing for remediation of the site. In July 1999, Watkins Johnson signed a remediation agreement with an environmental consulting firm, ARCADIS Geraghty and Miller, or ARCADIS. Pursuant to this remediation agreement, Watkins Johnson paid approximately $3.0 million in exchange for which ARCADIS agreed to perform the work necessary to assure satisfactory completion of Watkins Johnson's obligation under the consent decree. The agreement also includes a cost overrun guaranty from ARCADIS up to a total project cost of $15.0 million. In addition, the agreement included procurement of a 10-year, claims-made insurance policy to cover overruns of up to $10.0 million from American International Specialty, or AIS, along with a 10-year, claims-made $10.0 million policy to cover unknown pollution conditions at the site.

        Failure of Watkins Johnson, ARCADIS or AIS to fulfill their obligations may subject us to substantial fines, and we could be forced to suspend production, alter manufacturing processes or cease business operations, any of which could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations. We believe that the likelihood of the failure of Watkins Johnson, ARCADIS or AIS to fulfill their respective obligations is remote and that any remaining or uninsured environmental liabilities will not have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

14


Available Information

        We make available free of charge, through our website, www.aviza.com , our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with the SEC. Our publicly filed information is also available on the SEC's website, http://www.sec.gov . The information on our website is not incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 1A.    Risk Factors

        As a "smaller reporting company," we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

        None.

ITEM 2.    Properties

        The following table sets forth information concerning our principal real property as of September 26, 2008:

Location
  Type   Principal Use   Estimated
Square
Footage
  Property
Interest
  Expiration
Date
 

Scotts Valley, California

  Office, Manufacturing & R&D Process Laboratories   Headquarters, Sales, Customer service, Operations, Manufacturing, R&D and Engineering     213,000   Owned     N/A  

Orange, California

 

Office

 

Office, Software Test

   
3,700
 

Leased

   
12/31/2009
 

Newport, Wales, U.K. 

 

Office, Manufacturing & R&D Process Laboratories

 

Sales, Customer Service, Operations, Manufacturing, R&D and Engineering

   
103,000
 

Leased

   
3/24/2010
 

Nailsea, New Somerset, U.K. 

 

Manufacturing

 

Manufacturing

   
4,500
 

Leased

   
3/31/2010
 

        Our Scotts Valley property is encumbered by a mortgage that secures our borrowings under our commercial real estate term loan. We are currently exploring the possibility of selling our Scotts Valley property and relocating our headquarters to another location in the San Francisco Bay Area.

        We lease a number of smaller properties and field offices located in France, Germany, China, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan.

        We believe our current facilities are suitable and adequate to meet our current needs.

ITEM 3.    Legal Proceedings

        On April 11, 2006, IPS, Ltd. filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleges that we improperly used IPS's confidential information to develop our Celsior single-wafer processing type atomic layer deposition technology. The complaint is for unspecified monetary damages, injunctive relief and an order rescinding the settlement and distributor agreements that we and IPS entered into in May 2004 in settlement of a prior lawsuit that IPS filed against ASML U.S., Inc. and us in March 2004 relating to assets that we acquired from ASML in October 2003. In May 2007, we successfully moved the dispute to arbitration. Discovery commenced in June 2007. The arbitration hearing is currently scheduled for March 2009. The parties

15



have reached a settlement agreement in principle and we do not expect the final agreement to have a material impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

        Prior to our merger transaction with Trikon Technologies, Inc., Trikon was a party to an employment lawsuit in France. On March 10, 2004, Dr. Jihad Kiwan departed Trikon as Director and Chief Executive Officer. On March 29, 2004 and April 2, 2004, Trikon received letters from a United Kingdom law firm and from a French law firm, respectively, on behalf of Dr. Kiwan, detailing certain monetary claims for severance amounts due to Dr. Kiwan with respect to his employment with Trikon. On April 28, 2004, Dr. Kiwan filed a lawsuit in France and on June 10, 2004, filed similar proceedings in the United Kingdom. Dr. Kiwan has subsequently withdrawn the proceedings in the United Kingdom. On January 7, 2008, the French Commercial Court in Grenoble rejected certain of Dr. Kiwan's claims but ordered us to pay monetary awards with respect to certain other of Dr. Kiwan's claims. We have accrued the estimated settlement costs at September 26, 2008. We intend to appeal the decision and do not believe that the outcome of the dispute will have a material impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. The Court of Appeal has set the appeal hearing date for April 23, 2009.

        On December 1, 2006, we filed an arbitration demand against ASML U.S., Inc., and related entities, asserting claims of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, fraud in the inducement and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing arising out of our purchase of ASML's Thermal Division in October 2003. Following discovery and an unsuccessful motion for summary judgment filed by ASML, the matter was arbitrated in December 2007 and January 2008. The arbitrator issued a preliminary judgment in favor of ASML. Based on a provision in the governing contract providing that the party prevailing in the arbitration may recover its attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party, the arbitrator ordered briefings by both parties with regard to any fee request by ASML. On April 17, 2008, ASML submitted a petition seeking approximately $2.5 million in attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with this matter. Following full briefing by both parties, the arbitrator issued a final award of approximately $1.5 million in attorneys' fees and costs to ASML. We made an initial payment of $750,000 in October 2008 and will pay the remaining fees and costs pursuant to a payment schedule agreed to by ASML.

ITEM 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

        None.

16



PART II

ITEM 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information and Holders

        Our common stock trades publicly on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol "AVZA (changed to AVZAQ on June 19, 2009)." The following table sets forth the closing high and low prices per share of our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq Global Market for the periods indicated:

 
  Fiscal Year 2008   Fiscal Year 2007  
 
  High   Low   High   Low  

First Quarter

  $ 3.50   $ 1.66   $ 4.88   $ 3.73  

Second Quarter

    1.92     0.45     8.18     4.24  

Third Quarter

    0.68     0.51     8.99     5.01  

Fourth Quarter

    0.60     0.46     6.00     2.85  

        On December 2, 2008, the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market was $0.12 per share. According to the records of our transfer agent, there were 192 holders of record of our common stock on December 2, 2008.

Dividends

        We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. The terms of our revolving line of credit prohibit us from paying cash dividends on our common stock. We currently anticipate that we will retain all of our future earnings available for distribution to the holders of our common stock for use in the expansion and operation of our business, and thus do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

        The following table sets forth certain information as of September 26, 2008 with respect to shares of our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options granted, or available for grant, as applicable, to employees, consultants or members of our board of directors under: (i) our Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Plan, which we refer to as our 2005 Stock Plan; (ii) Trikon's 1991 Stock Option Plan, 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan and 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, each assumed by us in connection with our merger transaction with Trikon in December 2005, and

17



(iii) Aviza, Inc.'s 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, assumed by us in connection with our merger transaction with Trikon in December 2005.

Plan category
  Number of
securities to be
issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
  Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future issuance
under equity
compensation
plans (excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a))
 
 
  (a)
  (b)
  (c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

    4,984,066   $ 3.86     731,941  

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

             
               
 

Total

    4,984,066   $ 3.86     731,941  
               

ITEM 6.    Selected Financial Data

        As a "smaller reporting company," we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

        The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes that are included elsewhere in this report. In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations of our management that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors set forth elsewhere in this report.

Overview

        We design, manufacture, sell and support advanced semiconductor capital equipment and process technologies for the global semiconductor industry and related markets. We offer both front-end-of-line and back-end-of-line systems and process technologies used in a variety of segments of the semiconductor market using critical thin film formation technologies, including ALD, PVD, Etch, CVD and thermal processing systems.

        Our customer base is geographically diverse and includes both integrated device manufacturers and foundry-based manufacturers. We have a broad installed base, with approximately 2,500 systems in active operation, for which we are providing ongoing parts and services worldwide. We sell our systems globally primarily through a direct sales force and in some instances through local independent sales representatives. Our largest customers may vary from year to year depending upon, among other things, the customer's annual budget for capital expenditures, plans for new fabrication facilities and expansions and new system introductions by us. We expect to continue to receive a substantial portion of our net sales from a small number of customers for the foreseeable future.

        On December 1, 2005, we completed a merger transaction with Trikon Technologies, Inc., and our common stock is publicly traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol "AVZA (changed to AVZAQ on June 19, 2009)."

        We are often required to develop systems in advance of our customers' demand for those systems, and we undertake significant system development efforts in advance of any of our customers expressly

18



indicating demand for our systems. Our system development efforts typically span six months to two years.

        During the quarter ended March 28, 2008, we announced plans for a global restructuring based upon an analysis of our product strategy, served markets and internal operations. The restructuring allows us to refocus our attention on our core strengths in the ALD, Etch and PVD market segments. We have and will continue to downsize programs, products and spending related to trench capacitor technology for DRAM and will decrease our overall dependence on the DRAM market. The restructuring of our global workforce, products and business operations is designed to reduce our cost structure as well as improve operational execution and financial performance. We will continue to support our current global installed base and maintain the ability to manufacture additional systems as may be required by customers. During the fiscal year ended September 26, 2008, we recorded approximately $19.9 million in costs associated with the restructuring. These charges were primarily attributable to a global reduction in force of approximately 18% of employees and contractors and the write-down of assets relating to non-core products or processes, which included inventory revaluation, cancellation of purchase commitments, the write-down of equipment and the impairment of an intangible asset. We expect that annual savings as a result of our restructuring related to lower employee costs and lower depreciation expenses will be approximately $12.0 million.

        On March 28, 2008, we received notification from Nasdaq informing us that the bid price of our common stock closed below the minimum $1.00 per share requirement for continued inclusion under the Market Place Rule 4450(a)(5). We had requested and were granted a hearing before the Nasdaq panel to outline our plan to regain compliance. The hearing date was scheduled for November 20, 2008. However, on October 21, 2008, Nasdaq notified us that they were suspending the bid price and market value of publicly held shares requirements through Friday, January 16, 2009. Pursuant to this suspension, Nasdaq will not take any action through January 16, 2009 to delist companies for a bid price or market value of publicly held shares deficiency. Accordingly, the hearing scheduled on November 20, 2008 to address our bid price deficiency was canceled. If we are still deficient in bid price at the close of business on January 16, 2009, we will be notified to reschedule a new hearing date.

Critical Accounting Policies

        Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. We base our estimates on our historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

        We believe that the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

Revenue Recognition

        We recognize revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, or SAB 104, and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21, or EITF 00-21. These accounting standards require that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the price is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria for items (3) and

19



(4) above is based on our judgment regarding the fixed nature of the amounts charged for the systems delivered and the collectability of those amounts.

        We often undertake significant system development efforts in advance of any of our customers expressly indicating demand for our systems. As a result of the length of our sales cycles, our net sales for any period are generally weighted toward systems that we introduced for sale in prior years. For purposes of revenue recognition, we classify our systems into two categories, "proven technology" and "new technology." "Proven technology" systems are those systems with respect to which we have a history of successful installations within a reasonable time frame of delivery and the costs to complete installation do not vary materially from one instance to another. "New technology" systems are those systems with respect to which we cannot demonstrate that we can meet the provisions of customer acceptance at the time of shipment.

        We typically sell equipment and installation services as a bundled arrangement. Upon shipment of "proven technology," we record revenue upon shipment at the lesser of: (i) the residual amount after deducting the fair value of installation services from the contractual value, or (ii) the non-contingent amount. The remaining contractual revenue is recorded upon successful installation of the system. Cost of the equipment relating to "proven technology" is recorded upon shipment. To the extent a loss is calculated on shipment due to the foregoing deferral of revenue, a portion of the cost is also deferred to reflect zero gross profit at the time of shipment. The residual revenue, deferred costs and installation costs are recorded upon successful installation of the system. Revenue and cost of equipment relating to "new technology" is deferred until installation and acceptance at the customer's premises is completed.

        The result of these accounting policies is that for "new technology," our recognition of both revenue and cost of goods sold is delayed until customer acceptance, at which time both revenue and cost of goods sold are recognized in full in determining our gross margin. However, for "proven technology," our cost of goods sold may be recognized in full upon shipment, but recognition of a portion of our revenue is delayed until successful installation of the system. This can result in diminished gross margins at the time of shipment.

        Revenue from services is recognized as the services are performed. Revenue from prepaid service contracts is recognized ratably over the life of the contract. Revenue from spare parts is recorded upon shipment.

        We assess collectability based on the creditworthiness of our customers and past transaction history. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers. In addition, we require collateral from certain of our customers in the form of letters of credit. We have not experienced significant collection losses in the past. However, a significant change in the liquidity or financial position of any one of our customers, especially one or more of our most significant customers, could make it more difficult for us to assess creditworthiness, which could result in a financial loss.

Inventory Valuation

        We assess the recoverability of our inventory at the end of each quarter based on assumptions about customer demand and market conditions. Obsolete inventory or inventory in excess of our estimated usage is written down to its estimated market value less costs to sell. The inventory write-downs are recorded as an inventory valuation allowance established on the basis of obsolete inventory or specifically identified inventory in excess of established usage. Inherent in our estimates of market value in determining inventory valuation are estimates related to economic trends, future demand for our systems and technological obsolescence of our systems. If actual market conditions are less favorable than our projections, we may be required to write down additional inventory.

20


Warranty

        We accrue for the estimated cost of the warranty on our systems as cost of goods sold, which includes the cost of the labor and parts necessary to repair systems during the warranty period. The amounts recorded in the warranty accrual are estimated based on actual historical expenses incurred and on estimated probable future expenses related to our current sales. The warranty service is generally incurred ratably over the warranty period. Our systems typically have warranty periods ranging from one to three years. Our actual warranty costs in the future may vary from our historical warranty costs, which could result in adjustments to our warranty reserves in future periods.

Income Taxes

        As part of the process of preparing our financial statements, we are required to estimate our income tax provision (benefit) in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process requires us to estimate our current income tax provision (benefit) and assess temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our balance sheet.

        We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. While we have considered future taxable income and any ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, if we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, if we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of a net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.

Stock-Based Compensation

        We adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment , or SFAS 123(R). SFAS 123(R) establishes accounting for stock-based awards exchanged for employee services. Accordingly, stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee's requisite service period.

        The fair value of each option is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. We estimate expected stock price volatility and expected life based on historical data and representative peer group data. Estimated forfeitures are based on historical employee turnover rates. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield with similar contractual life.

21


Results of Operations (in thousands)

        The financial information reported in the table below is for the fiscal years ended September 26, 2008 (fiscal 2008) and September 28, 2007 (fiscal 2007), each of which included 52 weeks.

 
  Fiscal  
 
  2008   2007  

Net sales

    100 %   100 %
           

Cost of goods sold:

             
 

Cost of goods sold

    68 %   69 %
 

Cost of goods sold—restructuring charges

    10 %   0 %
           
   

Total cost of sales

    78 %   69 %
           

Gross margin

    22 %   31 %
           

Operating expenses:

             
 

Research and development

    22 %   14 %
 

Selling, general and administrative

    27 %   15 %
 

Restructuring and other charges

    7 %   0 %
           
   

Total operating expenses

    56 %   29 %
           

Income (loss) from operations

    (34 )%   2 %
           

Other income (expense):

             
 

Interest income

    0 %   0 %
 

Interest expense

    (1 )%   (1 )%
 

Other income (expense)—net

    0 %   0 %
           
   

Total other expense—net

    (1 )%   (1 )%
           

Income (loss) before income taxes

    (35 )%   1 %

Provision for income taxes

    0 %   1 %
           

Net income (loss)

    (35 )%   0 %
           

Net Sales

 
  Fiscal  
 
  2008   2007  
 
  (in thousands)
 

Net sales

  $ 133,189   $ 231,435  

        Net sales for fiscal 2008 decreased $98.2 million, or 42%, from fiscal 2007. The decrease was primarily due to the following:

    A $113.6 million decrease in net sales of our deposition and thermal processing systems. Sales recognized on shipment decreased by $98.1 million as system shipments decreased by 88% during fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007. Net sales recognized at customer acceptance decreased by $15.6 million due primarily to an $11.1 million reduction in RVP-300 plus system acceptance revenue, which reflects the impact of a 91% decrease in RVP-300 plus system shipments during fiscal 2008. The decrease was due primarily to market pricing pressure for our DRAM customers and changes relating to trench capacitor technology within our customer group.

    The decrease in net sales of our deposition and thermal processing systems was partially offset by a $17.9 million, or 35%, increase in net sales of our PVD, Etch and CVD systems, which

22


      reflects a 26% increase in modules shipped during fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2008, net sales of these systems to Asia and the United States increased by 151% and 55%, respectively, over fiscal 2007. This reflects additional customer penetrations achieved subsequent to our acquisition of Trikon.

    Service and spares sales were approximately 5% less during fiscal 2008 due primarily to lower equipment utilization at our customer sites.

        During fiscal 2007, our Deep Silicon Etch Chamber, or DSi Chamber became "proven technology."

        During fiscal 2008, Win Semiconductor Corporation accounted for 16% of our net sales. Approximately 57% of our net sales in fiscal 2008 were attributable to our top ten customers. During fiscal 2007, Inotera Memories, Inc. and Nan Ya Technologies Corp. accounted for 29% and 12% of net sales, respectively, and approximately 67% of our net sales in fiscal 2007 were attributable to our top ten customers.

        International sales accounted for 77% and 83% of net sales during fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. We believe that net sales generated outside the United States will continue to account for the majority of our net sales for the foreseeable future.

Gross Profit and Gross Margin

        Gross profit is the difference between net sales and cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold consists of purchased material, labor and overhead to manufacture equipment or spare parts and the cost of service and factory and field support to customers for warranty, installation and paid service calls. In addition, the cost of outsourcing the assembly or manufacturing of subsystems to third parties is included in cost of goods sold. Gross margin is gross profit expressed as a percentage of net sales.

 
  Fiscal  
 
  2008   2007  
 
  (dollars in thousands)
 

Gross profit

  $ 29,816   $ 71,513  

Gross margin

    22 %   31 %

        The decrease in gross margin of 9% during fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007 was primarily due to restructuring charges of $13.3 million recorded during fiscal 2008. As noted previously, we implemented a global restructuring plan during fiscal 2008 which will allow us to focus our attention on our core strength in the ALD, Etch and PVD market segments. We have made progress in and are continuing the process of restructuring our global work force, products and business operations. As a result, we incurred charges to cost of goods sold during fiscal 2008 relating to the restructuring as follows (in thousands):

Reduction in work force

  $ 674  

Loss on non-cancellable purchase commitments

    2,178  

Revaluation of inventory

    10,471  
       

Total restructuring cost—cost of goods sold—fiscal 2008

  $ 13,323  
       

        Excluding the impact of restructuring charges, gross margin for fiscal 2008 was 2% higher than gross margin for fiscal 2007. This increase in gross margin was primarily attributable to the following:

    Gross margin recognized on shipment of our systems was approximately 9% higher during fiscal 2008 due to changes in the product mix, with a higher proportion of PVD, Etch and CVD shipments and a lower proportion of thermal processing systems.

23


    Gross margin recognized on acceptance of our systems at the customers' sites increased by approximately 3% due to changes in the product mix and higher average selling prices per module for Etch systems shipped in fiscal 2008.

    Gross margin on service-related activities decreased by approximately 4% due primarily to lower demand for installation and warranty services created by lower shipments during fiscal 2008.

    A reduction in manufacturing labor and overhead costs of approximately $8.9 million was more than offset by lower manufacturing cost absorption of $12.0 million due to a decrease in the number of systems produced in fiscal 2008 primarily in relation to an 88% decrease in deposition and thermal system shipments.

Research and Development

        Research and development expense consists of employment costs attributable to employees, consultants and contractors who primarily spend their time on system design, engineering and process development; materials and supplies used in system prototyping, including wafers, chemicals and process gases; depreciation and amortization expense allocable to research and development activities and facilities; direct charges for repairs to research equipment and laboratories; costs of outside services for facilities; and process engineering support and wafer analytical services. We also include in research and development any expenses associated with the preparation, filing and prosecution of patents and other intellectual property.

 
  Fiscal  
 
  2008   2007  
 
  (dollars in thousands)
 

Research and development

  $ 29,927   $ 31,901  

Percent of net sales

    22 %   14 %

        Research and development expense for fiscal 2008 decreased by approximately $2.0 million, or 6%, as compared to fiscal 2007. While we continue to invest in research and development related to ALD, PVD, Etch and CVD business activities, we have significantly reduced our research and development spending related to thermal products. The reduction in spending in fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007 was due primarily to the following:

    Decreased salaries and benefits of approximately $1.4 million due primarily to a reduction in work force related to our restructuring plan. Headcount was reduced by 27% from September 28, 2007 to September 26, 2008.

    As part of our restructuring plan implemented during fiscal 2008, we deemphasized continued research and development activity related to our thermal product lines. As a result, we reduced costs for supplies, chemicals, gases, prototype supplies and outside services by approximately $1.0 million through decreased thermal development activities.

    A $1.0 million decrease in net prototype supplies related primarily to a next generation product development project which was substantially completed in fiscal 2007.

        These reductions were partially offset by:

    Increased depreciation, amortization and equipment rental expenses of approximately $1.0 million related primarily to equipment installed in our development laboratories.

    Increased travel expense of approximately $0.4 million related primarily to PVD, Etch and CVD business opportunities in Asia.

24


Selling, General and Administrative

        Selling, general and administrative expense consists of employment costs attributable to employees, consultants and contractors who primarily spend their time on sales, marketing and order administration and corporate administrative services; occupancy costs attributable to employees performing these functions; sales commissions; promotional marketing expenses; and legal and accounting expenses.

 
  Fiscal  
 
  2008   2007  
 
  (dollars in thousands)
 

Selling, general and administrative

  $ 35,510   $ 34,116  

Percent of net sales

    27 %   15 %

        Selling, general and administrative expense for fiscal 2008 increased $1.4 million, or 4%, as compared to fiscal 2007. The increase was primarily due to the following:

    A $4.5 million increase in legal fees due primarily to costs associated with the arbitration case with ASML and other pending legal matters.

    Increased expenses of $0.6 million at our international subsidiaries, primarily France, Japan, Singapore and China, related to infrastructure build up.

    A $0.4 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense due primarily to the upgrade to Oracle 11i, which was completed at the end of fiscal 2007.

        These increases were partially offset by:

    Lower salary, wages and employee benefits of approximately $1.8 million due primarily to lower headcount (13% reduction in headcount from September 28, 2007 to September 26, 2008).

    Lower travel costs of approximately $0.4 million due primarily to lower thermal system business levels and implementation of Oracle 11i that was completed in fiscal 2007.

    A $1.0 million increase in currency transaction gains.

    Approximately $0.6 million in reduced supplies expense due to the reduction in headcount and the completion of Oracle 11i implementation in fiscal 2007.

    A $0.4 million decrease in consulting fees primarily related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance and the Oracle 11i upgrade in fiscal 2007.

Restructuring and Other Charges

 
  Fiscal  
 
  2008   2007  
 
  (dollars in thousands)
 

Restructuring and Other charges

  $ 9,632   $  

Percentage of net sales

    7 %    

        During fiscal 2008, we implemented restructuring plans to align operations with our core strength products in the ALD, Etch and PVD market segments. This entailed a downsizing of activities related to lower performing, less profitable products resulting in a global reduction in force, the write-down of impaired machinery and equipment and the divestiture of the net assets of ET Equipments Ltd., a machine shop located in Wales, U.K. We also wrote down certain intangible assets related to licenses of certain technologies due to the impairment of their value.

25


        The breakdown of restructuring and other charges included in operating expenses for fiscal 2008 is as follows (in thousands):

Impairment of machinery and equipment

  $ 3,854  

Impairment of intagible assets

    4,639  

Loss on sale of net assets of ET Equipments Ltd. 

    543  

Reduction in work force

    530  

Other

    66  
       

 

  $ 9,632  
       

Interest Expense

 
  Fiscal  
 
  2008   2007  
 
  (dollars in thousands)
 

Interest expense

  $ 1,953   $ 3,445  

Percent of net sales

    1 %   1 %

        Our interest expense for fiscal 2008 and 2007 consisted primarily of interest paid on our revolving line of credit, equipment term loan and commercial real estate term loan. In addition, amortization of debt issuance costs impacted both fiscal years. During fiscal 2007, interest expense included amortization of the fair value of the warrants issued to affiliates of VantagePoint Venture Partners (VPVP) in consideration of VPVP's agreement to guarantee a portion of our prior revolving line of credit. During April 2007, we entered into a new financing agreement that did not require guarantees. Unamortized debt issuance costs and warrant amortization related to our prior credit agreements were written off when our current credit agreement became effective.

        Aggregate borrowings under our current revolving line of credit, equipment term loan and commercial real estate term loan were $42.1 million and $28.3 million at September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively.

        Interest expense decreased by approximately $1.5 million during fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007 primarily due to a lower average interest rate on our credit facility (5.7% as compared to 7.7%) and lower amortization of debt issuance costs ($0.1 million as compared to $0.6 million). Average borrowings under our credit facility were $30.4 million and $30.1 million for fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Income Taxes

        Because we have incurred significant operating losses, we have not recorded any material federal or state income taxes. We recorded income taxes relating to certain profitable international subsidiaries of $0.4 million and $1.6 million in fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively.

        During fiscal 2007, one of the subsidiaries we acquired in connection with the merger with Trikon generated sufficient taxable income to recognize a portion of the net deferred tax assets we acquired in the merger related to net operating loss carryforwards. Our management had previously been unable to assert that it was more likely than not that we would generate sufficient taxable income to realize the net deferred tax assets in excess of the deferred tax liabilities recorded in relation to the write-up of inventory and intangibles to fair value at December 1, 2005, the date of the consummation of the merger transaction. Accordingly, the net deferred tax assets had been previously offset by a full valuation allowance. In the absence of goodwill, under generally accepted accounting principles, the tax benefit derived from reversal of this valuation allowance must be applied first to reduce non-current

26



intangible assets related to the merger transaction, and second to reduce income tax expense. We recognized approximately $1,023,000 of the valuation allowance attributed to net deferred tax assets relating to the net operating loss carryforwards acquired in the merger transaction during fiscal 2007 and the intangible assets acquired in the merger transaction have been reduced accordingly. The remaining net deferred tax assets continue to be offset by a full valuation allowance at September 26, 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        At September 26, 2008, our cash and cash equivalents were $14.9 million as compared to $23.1 million at September 28, 2007. The net decrease in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to the following:

    Cash used in operations of $17.0 million primarily related to net losses ($47.4 million), adjusted for non-cash reconciling items ($27.6 million) including non-cash restructuring and other charges ($19.3 million), increases in inventory ($4.7 million) and decreases in warranty liability ($4.8 million), which more than offset decreases in accounts receivable ($3.4 million) and prepaid and other assets, and other long-term assets ($2.5 million), and increases in accounts payable ($1.2 million) and accrued liabilities ($5.2 million).

    $4.1 million of cash used in the purchase of plant and equipment related primarily to our development and demonstration laboratories, partially offset by $0.9 million from the sale of the net assets of ET Equipment, LTD. and from the sale of equipment.

    A net increase in borrowings of $12.4 million.

        On October 1, 2008, our credit facility was amended to extend the maturity date of the revolving portion of the credit facility from April 13, 2009 to October 13, 2009, provided we achieve certain operating results during the quarter ending December 26, 2008. If we are unable to achieve the required results, the maturity date for the revolving portion of the credit facility will be April 13, 2009. If this happens, we cannot assure you that we would be able to refinance the existing liability under favorable terms, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        In the U.S., recent market and economic conditions have been unprecedented and challenging with tighter credit conditions and slower growth. Continued concerns about the systemic impact of inflation, energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of credit, the U.S. mortgage market and a declining real estate market in the U.S. have contributed to increased market volatility and diminished expectations for the U.S. economy. Added concerns fueled by the federal government conservatorship of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Federal National Mortgage Association, the declared bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., the U.S. government provided loan to American International Group Inc. and other federal government interventions in the U.S. credit markets lead to increased market uncertainty and instability in both U.S. and international capital and credit markets. These conditions, combined with volatile oil prices, declining business and consumer confidence and increased unemployment have in recent months contributed to volatility of unprecedented levels.

        As a result of these market conditions, the cost and availability of credit has been and may continue to be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit spreads. Concern about the stability of the markets generally and the strength of counterparties specifically has lead many lenders and institutional investors to reduce, and in some cases, cease to provide funding to borrowers. Continued turbulence in the U.S. and international markets and economies may harm our liquidity and financial condition, and the liquidity and financial condition of our customers. If these market conditions continue, they may limit our ability, and the ability of our customers, to timely replace

27



maturing liabilities and access the capital markets to meet liquidity needs, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        We anticipate that our existing cash balances and available borrowings under our credit facility will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months. However, we may choose to raise additional capital from the sale of debt or equity securities or from other sources in order to support our operations and expansion plans. We may not be able to obtain any additional capital on acceptable terms, if at all.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

        Operating activities used approximately $17.0 million of cash during fiscal 2008. Cash was used to fund operating losses of approximately $47.4 million incurred during fiscal 2008. Non-cash operating costs totaling $27.6 million, consisting primarily of depreciation and amortization, restructuring and other charges and stock based compensation were included in the operating loss for the year. Cash provided by a decrease of approximately $3.4 million in accounts receivable due to collection of retentions due on shipments, a decrease of approximately $2.5 million in prepaid expenses and other current assets and other long-term assets, a $1.2 million increase in accounts payable due to timing of inventory purchases and a $5.2 million increase in accrued liabilities primarily related to increased legal costs and restructuring charges was partially offset by cash used to fund increases in inventory of approximately $4.7 million primarily related to increased PVD, Etch and CVD business opportunities and a decrease of approximately $4.8 million in warranty liabilities due primarily to lower system shipments during fiscal 2008.

        Cash provided by operating activities for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2007 was $3.2 million. Net income during the fiscal year ended September 28, 2007 of approximately $0.4 million, which together with non-cash expense adjustments (primarily depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation and net operating loss utilization) aggregating $8.4 million, provided cash from operating activities to offset cash used to fund changes in operating assets and liabilities. Net changes in operating assets and liabilities during the fiscal year ended September 28, 2007 used approximately $5.6 million of cash. Cash used to fund increases in accounts receivable and reductions in accounts payable and accrued liabilities were $9.1 million, $9.0 million and $0.8 million, respectively. These uses of cash were partially offset by cash generated through reductions in inventory, decreases in prepaid and other assets and increases in warranty liability of approximately $11.2 million, $1.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

        Cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2008 was $3.2 million. Investing activities during fiscal 2008 consisted primarily of purchasing equipment primarily used in our development and demonstration laboratories, which used approximately $4.1 million. Proceeds from the sale of the net assets of ET Equipments Ltd. and certain other equipment totaling $0.9 million partially offset cash used to purchase equipment.

        Cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2007 was $9.7 million. Investing activities during fiscal 2007 consisted of purchasing equipment primarily used in our development and demonstration laboratories.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

        Net cash provided by financing activities for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2008 was $12.3 million. Incremental borrowings under our revolving lines of credit generated $15.6 million in cash. Payments on our equipment and commercial real estate loans, short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations were the primary offsets to these borrowings.

28


        Net cash provided by financing activities for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2007 was $19.4 million. Net proceeds from our public offering of 4,600,000 shares of our common stock and exercise of stock options provided $27.7 million in cash. A reduction in our aggregate borrowings of approximately $8.0 million and $0.3 million of debt issuance cost incurred partially offset proceeds from the issuance of our common stock.

        During April 2007, we entered into our current credit facility with a syndicate of banks to refinance our then-existing line of credit and mortgage line of credit. The credit facility includes a two-year revolving line of credit, a three-year equipment term loan and a four-year commercial real estate term loan. Under the original terms of the credit facility, we could borrow up to $55.0 million, and borrowings bore interest at the London Inter Bank Offering Rate, or LIBOR, plus 2.18% (4.67% at September 26, 2008). The credit agreement contains certain financial and operating covenants. Loan commitment fees and other direct expenses totaling $302,000, incurred to secure the facility are being amortized over the lives of the respective loans.

        Maximum borrowings under the revolving line of credit were $44.0 million and are secured by our accounts receivable and inventory. Outstanding borrowings under the revolving line of credit were $28.5 million and $12.9 million at September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively.

        Maximum borrowings under the equipment term loan were $4.0 million and are secured by a lien on our equipment. Our equipment term loan has a three-year amortization period with monthly payments of principal and accrued interest. Outstanding borrowings under the equipment term loan were $2.3 million and $3.6 million at September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively. As principal is paid down under the equipment portion of the facility, additional borrowing availability will be created under the revolving portion of the credit facility.

        Maximum borrowings under the commercial real estate term loan were $13.0 million or 70% of the appraised value of the real estate, whichever is lower, and are secured by a deed of trust on our Scotts Valley facility. Monthly payments of principal and accrued interest are based on a 20-year amortization period of the loan principal. Outstanding borrowings under the commercial real estate term loan were $11.3 million and $11.8 million at September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively. As principal is paid down under the commercial real estate portion of the facility, additional borrowing availability will be created under the revolving portion of the credit facility.

        On September 30, 2008 our credit facility was amended to reduce the maximum available for borrowing to approximately $42.6 million, increase the interest rate on outstanding borrowings to LIBOR plus 4.00% and amend certain financial and operating covenants.

        On October 1, 2008, our credit facility was amended to extend the maturity date of the revolving portion of the credit facility from April 13, 2009 to October 13, 2009, provided we achieve certain operating results during the quarter ending December 26, 2008. If we are unable to achieve the required results the maturity date for the revolving portion of the credit facility will be April 13, 2009.

        Our Japanese subsidiary has a revolving line of credit for 200,000,000 Japanese Yen (approximately $1.9 million at the exchange rate on September 26, 2008) under which there were no borrowings at September 26, 2008. Borrowings under this line of credit bear interest at 1.875% per annum.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

        As of September 26, 2008, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

29


Contractual Obligations

        Other than operating leases for certain equipment, real estate and certain vendor commitments we have no significant off-balance sheet transactions or unconditional purchase obligations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        During February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, or SFAS 159. SFAS 159 allows companies to elect to measure financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains or losses on items for which the fair value option is applied are reported in income during the period earned or incurred. SFAS 159 is effective for our fiscal year beginning September 27, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 159 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        During December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment to Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) 51 , or SFAS 160. SFAS 160 amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting guidelines for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a non controlling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in a consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. It requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts including both the parent and non-controlling interest. SFAS 160 establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parent ownership interest in a subsidiary that does not result in deconsolidation. SFAS 160 is effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning September 25, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 160 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, or SFAS 141R. SFAS 141R establishes principles and guidelines for acquirers relating to the measurement and recognition in the financial statements of identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and any goodwill acquired. In addition, SFAS 141R establishes disclosure requirements for business combinations. SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning January 1, 2009. We are evaluating the impact of the adoption of this statement on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flow.

        During March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, or SFAS 161. SFAS 161 requires companies holding derivative instruments to disclose information that should allow financial statement readers to understand how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning September 25, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 161 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        During April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets , which amends SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets , relating to factors that should be considered in developing assumptions about renewal or extension used in estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible. The statement is intended to provide consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used under SFAS 141R to measure the fair value of the asset and other Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. FSP No. 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Provisions of this standard apply to intangible assets acquired after January 1, 2009.

ITEM 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

        As a "smaller reporting company," we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

30


ITEM 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Aviza Technology, Inc.:

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Aviza Technology, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 26, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year then ended. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audit.

        We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Aviza Technology, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 26, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

Armanino McKenna, LLP
San Ramon, California
December 9, 2008

31


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Aviza Technology, Inc.:

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Aviza Technology, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 28, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for year ended September 28, 2007. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audit.

        We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Aviza Technology, Inc. and subsidiaries at September 28, 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for year ended September 28, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
San Jose, California December 11, 2007

32



AVIZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except par amounts and number of shares)

 
  September 26, 2008   September 28, 2007  

ASSETS

             

CURRENT ASSETS:

             
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 14,896   $ 23,087  
 

Accounts receivable—net of allowance of $399 and $178, respectively

    31,580     37,202  
 

Inventory

    37,662     45,529  
 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

    4,028     5,317  
           
   

Total current assets

    88,166     111,135  

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT—net

    24,443     31,781  

INTANGIBLE ASSETS—net

    62     3,333  

OTHER LONG-TERM ASSETS

    1,118     1,831  
           

TOTAL ASSETS

  $ 113,789   $ 148,080  
           

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

             

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

             
 

Short-term borrowings and current portion of notes payable

  $ 31,073   $ 15,043  
 

Accounts payable

    22,127     22,536  
 

Warranty liability

    6,143     11,222  
 

Accrued liabilities

    18,073     13,391  
           
   

Total current liabilities

    77,416     62,192  

NOTES PAYABLE—Long-term

    11,654     14,490  

OTHER LIABILITIES—Long-term

    175      
           
   

Total liabilities

    89,245     76,682  
           

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 9)

             

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:

             
 

Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value—5,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding

         
 

Common stock, $0.0001 par value—100,000,000 shares authorized; 21,856,473 and 20,846,549 shares issued and outstanding at September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively

    2     2  
 

Additional paid-in capital

    122,128     118,400  
 

Accumulated deficit

    (97,338 )   (49,974 )
 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

    (248 )   2,970  
           
   

Total stockholders' equity

    24,544     71,398  
           

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

  $ 113,789   $ 148,080  
           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

33



AVIZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 
  Fiscal Year Ended  
 
  September 26,
2008
  September 28,
2007
 

NET SALES

  $ 133,189   $ 231,435  
           

COST OF GOODS SOLD:

             
 

Cost of goods sold

    90,050     159,922  
 

Cost of goods sold—restructuring

    13,323      
           
   

Total cost of goods sold

    103,373     159,922  
           

GROSS PROFIT

    29,816     71,513  
           

OPERATING EXPENSES:

             
 

Research and development

    29,927     31,901  
 

Selling, general and administrative

    35,510     34,116  
 

Restructuring and other charges

    9,632      
           
     

Total operating expenses

    75,069     66,017  
           

INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS:

    (45,253 )   5,496  
           

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):

             
 

Interest income

    124     375  
 

Interest expense

    (1,953 )   (3,445 )
 

Other income (expense)—net

    68     (415 )
           
     

Total other expense—net

    (1,761 )   (3,485 )
           

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES

    (47,014 )   2,011  

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

    350     1,628  
           

NET INCOME (LOSS)

  $ (47,364 ) $ 383  
           

Net income (loss) per share:

             
 

Basic

  $ (2.19 ) $ 0.02  
           
 

Diluted

  $ (2.19 ) $ 0.02  
           

Weighted average common shares:

             
 

Basic

    21,657,357     18,824,561  
           
 

Diluted

    21,657,357     19,606,214  
           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

34



AVIZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands, except share amounts)

 
  Common Stock    
   
   
   
 
 
  Additional
Paid-In
Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Accumulated
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
   
 
 
  Shares   Amount   Total  

BALANCE—September 29, 2006

    16,150,752   $ 2   $ 88,655   $ (50,357 ) $ 594   $ 38,894  

Exercise of employee and director stock options

    95,797         221             221  

Issuance of common stock in public offering, net of offering costs

    4,600,000         27,476             27,476  

Stock-based compensation

            2,048             2,048  

Components of comprehensive income:

                                     

Cumulative translation adjustment

                    2,376     2,376  

Net income

                383         383  
                                     

Total comprehensive income

                        2,759  
                           

BALANCE—September 28, 2007

    20,846,549   $ 2   $ 118,400   $ (49,974 ) $ 2,970   $ 71,398  

Exercise of employee and director stock options

    9,924         9             9  

Issuance of common stock in the acquisition of technology license

    1,000,000         1,830             1,830  

Stock-based compensation

              1,889             1,889  

Components of comprehensive loss:

                                     

Cumulative translation adjustment

                    (3,218 )   (3,218 )

Net loss

                (47,364 )       (47,364 )
                                     

Total comprehensive loss

                        (50,582 )
                           

BALANCE—September 26, 2008

    21,856,473   $ 2   $ 122,128   $ (97,338 ) $ (248 ) $ 24,544  
                           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

35



AVIZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 
  Fiscal Year Ended  
 
  September 26,
2008
  September 28,
2007
 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

             
 

Net income (loss)

  $ (47,364 ) $ 383  
   

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

             
   

Depreciation

    5,215     4,129  
   

Amortization

    528     1,095  
   

Non cash restructuring and other charges

    19,307      
   

Tax benefit from use of acquired net operating losses

        1,023  
   

Fair value of common stock issued for prototype materials

    125      
   

Stock-based compensation

    1,889     2,048  
   

Loss on impairment of equipment

    310      
   

Provision (recoveries) of allowance for doubtful accounts

    239     (91 )
   

Write-off of costs of prior financing agreements

        176  
   

Changes in assets and liabilities :

             
     

Accounts receivable

    3,380     (9,137 )
     

Inventory

    (4,705 )   11,250  
     

Prepaid expenses and other current assets, and other long-term assets

    2,454     1,759  
     

Accounts payable

    1,230     (8,997 )
     

Warranty liability

    (4,853 )   284  
     

Accrued liabilities

    5,221     (765 )
           
       

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

    (17,024 )   3,157  
           

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

             
 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

    (4,112 )   (9,667 )
 

Purchase of technology license

    (48 )    
 

Proceeds from sale of equipment

    342      
 

Proceeds from the sale of the net assets of ET Equipment LTD. 

    600      
           
       

Net cash used in investing activities

    (3,218 )   (9,667 )
           

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

             
 

Net proceeds (payments) from credit lines

    15,557     (15,340 )
 

Proceeds from the issuance of common stock

    9     27,697  
 

Net proceeds on refinancing of mortgage loans

        5,635  
 

Debt issuance cost

        (302 )
 

Proceeds from equipment loan

        4,000  
 

Payments on mortgage loan

    (493 )   (314 )
 

Payments on other borrowings

    (1,080 )   (1,343 )
 

Payments on equipment loan

    (1,319 )   (397 )
 

Payments on capital lease obligations

    (318 )   (275 )
           
       

Net cash provided by financing activities

    12,356     19,361  
           
 

Effect of exchange rates on foreign cash balances

    (305 )   (486 )
           

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

    (8,191 )   12,365  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

             
 

Beginning of period

    23,087     10,722  
           
 

End of period

  $ 14,896   $ 23,087  
           

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

             
 

Cash paid for interest

  $ 1,773   $ 3,018  
           
 

Income taxes paid

  $ 717   $ 355  
           

Noncash investing and financing activities:

             
 

Equipment acquired under capital lease

  $ 71   $ 725  
           
 

Fair value of common stock issued in the acquisition of technology license

  $ 1,715   $  
           
 

Property and equipment purchases included in accounts payable at end of fiscal year

  $ 7   $ 294  
           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

36



AVIZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. BACKGROUND AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

        Aviza Technology, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, "Aviza") design, manufacture, sell and support advanced semiconductor capital equipment and process technologies for the global semiconductor industry and related markets. Aviza was formerly the Thermal Division of ASML Holding, N.V. ("ASML"), a Netherlands corporation. On September 18, 2003, Aviza was incorporated as Thermal Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation, by VantagePoint Venture Partners and its affiliates (collectively referred to as "VantagePoint") to acquire the Thermal Division business of ASML ("Predecessor"). There were no operations of Aviza from September 18, 2003 to October 7, 2003. On October 10, 2003 ("the acquisition date"), Thermal Acquisition Corporation acquired certain assets and liabilities of the Predecessor and changed its name to Aviza Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), at which time Aviza began to operate independently from ASML.

        During December 2005, we completed a merger transaction with Trikon Technologies Inc., a public company that traded on the NASDAQ Global market. For accounting purposes, Aviza was deemed to have acquired Trikon. The common stock of Aviza is publicly traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol "AVZA (changed to AVZAQ on June 19, 2009)".

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

         Fiscal Year —Our fiscal year ends on the Friday nearest to September 30 and consisted of 52 weeks for the fiscal years ended September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively.

         Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements —The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

         Principles of Consolidation —The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

         Cash Equivalents —We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

         Concentration of Credit Risk —Financial instruments that subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Ongoing credit evaluations of customers' financial condition are performed and the amount of credit is limited when deemed necessary. At September 26, 2008, there were no individual customers constituting 10% or more of accounts receivable. Four different customers accounted for 18%, 14%, 10% and 10% of accounts receivable at September 28, 2007. Cash balances held with banks periodically exceed the amounts of insurance provided on such balances.

         Allowance for Doubtful Accounts —We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and record specific allowances for bad debt relating to specific system shipments when a customer is unable to meet its financial obligations. Historical trends are used to determine allowances related to service and spare part sales. Account receivable are written off when all avenues of collection have been exhausted and we record a benefit when a previously written off account is subsequently collected.

         Fair Value of Financial Instruments —Carrying amounts of certain of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, approximate fair value

37



AVIZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


due to their short maturities. The fair value of our debt at September 26, 2008 approximated book value.

         Inventories —Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. Cost includes production labor, raw materials and manufacturing overhead.

         Property, Plant and Equipment —Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated over average periods of 25 years for buildings, 4 to 10 years for building improvements, 5 to 7 years for machinery and equipment, 2 to 7 years for purchased software, 5 to 7 years for office furnishings and equipment and 2 to 5 years for vehicles utilizing the straight-line method.

         Intangible Assets —We evaluate intangible assets for indicators of possible impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives ranging from ten to fifteen years.

         Impairment of Long Lived Assets —We evaluate our long-lived assets for indicators of possible impairment by comparison of the carrying amounts to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by such assets, or the asset's fair value, when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Should an impairment exist, the impairment loss would be measured based on the excess carrying value of the asset over the asset's fair value or the discounted value of estimated future cash flows.

         Warranty— We accrue for the estimated cost of the warranty on our systems, which includes the cost of the labor and parts necessary to repair systems during the warranty period. The amounts recorded in the warranty accrual are estimated based on actual historical expenses incurred and on estimated probable future expenses related to current sales. Systems typically have warranty periods ranging from one to three years. The components of the warranty accrual are as follows:

 
  Fiscal Year Ended  
 
  September 26,
2008
  September 28,
2007
 
 
  (in thousands)
 

Beginning warranty accrual

  $ 11,222   $ 10,816  

Additional accruals for new shipments

    3,086     9,800  

Warranty costs incurred

    (6,317 )   (8,988 )

Expiration and change in warranty liability for pre-existing warranties during the period

    (1,848 )   (406 )
           

Ending warranty accrual

  $ 6,143   $ 11,222  
           

         Guarantees —In addition to product warranties, we, from time to time, in the normal course of business, indemnify certain customers against third party claims that our products, when used for their intended purposes, infringe the intellectual property rights of such third party or other claims made against certain parties. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount of liability under these indemnification obligations due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances that are likely to be involved in each particular claim. Historically, we have not made payments under these obligations and no liabilities have been recorded for these obligations on the balance sheet at September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively.

38



AVIZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

         Revenue Recognition —We recognize revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 ("SAB 104") and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No 00-21 ("EITF 00-21"). These accounting standards require that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized:

    (1)
    Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

    (2)
    Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;

    (3)
    The price is fixed or determinable; and

    (4)
    Collectability is reasonably assured.

        Determination of criteria for items (3) and (4) above is based on our judgment regarding the fixed nature of the amounts charged for the systems delivered and the collectability of those amounts.

        For purposes of revenue recognition, we classify our systems into two categories, "proven technology" and "new technology." "Proven technology" systems are those systems with respect to which we have a history of successful installations within a reasonable time frame of delivery and the costs to complete installation do not vary materially from one instance to another. "New technology" systems are those systems with respect to which we cannot demonstrate that we can meet the provisions of customer acceptance at the time of shipment.

        We typically sell equipment and installation services as a bundled arrangement. Upon shipment of "proven technology," we record revenue upon shipment at the lesser of: (i) the residual amount after deducting the fair value of installation services from the contractual value, or (ii) the non-contingent amount. The remaining contractual revenue is recognized upon successful installation of the system. Cost of the equipment relating to "proven technology" is recognized upon shipment. The deferred revenue, deferred costs and installation costs are recorded upon successful installation of the system. Revenue and cost of equipment and installation relating to "new technology" is deferred until installation and acceptance at the customer's premises is completed.

        Revenue from services is recognized as the services are performed. Revenue from prepaid service contracts is recognized ratably over the life of the contract. Revenue from spare parts is recorded upon shipment.

         Research and Development Costs —Costs relating to research and development are charged to operating expense as incurred.

         Income Taxes —We provide for income taxes based on an asset and liability approach in accounting for income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities which are measured using enacted tax rates. We provide valuation allowances against deferred income tax assets that we do not expect to realize on a more likely-than-not basis. Deferred tax expense results from the change in the net deferred tax assets or liabilities between periods.

         Advertising Expenses— Costs relating to advertising are charged to operating expenses as incurred. We incurred $3,000 and $45,000 for the fiscal years ended September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively.

         Foreign Currency— The majority of our foreign operations have the local currency as the functional currency. For foreign operations with the local currency as the functional currency, local currency

39



AVIZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


denominated assets and liabilities are translated at the year-end exchange rates and revenue, costs and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the year. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency translation are included as a component of other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance sheet. Non- functional foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are re-measured at the year-end exchange rate except for inventories, prepaid expenses and fixed assets, which are re-measured at the historical exchange rates. Foreign currency denominated revenue, costs and expenses are recorded at the average exchange rates during the year, except for costs and expenses related to items such as inventories and fixed assets, which are re-measured using historical exchange rates. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency re-measurement are included in operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

        Foreign currency denominated long-term intercompany loans are re-measured at the historical rate and resulting gains or losses are included as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated balance sheet. Gains and losses realized from transactions, including intercompany balances not considered to be a permanent investment, denominated in currencies other than the local currency are included as part of the operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.

        Net foreign currency gains included in operating expenses were $1,573,000 and $563,000 for the fiscal years ended September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively.

         Stock-Based Compensation —We adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, or SFAS 123(R). SFAS 123(R) requires stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the employee's requisite service period. The measurement of stock-based compensation cost is based on several criteria including, but not limited to, the valuation model used and associated input factors such as expected term of the award, stock price volatility, dividend rate, risk-free interest rate and award cancellation rate. The input factors used in the valuation model are based on subjective future expectations combined with management judgment. If there is a difference between the assumptions used in determining stock-based compensation costs and the actual factors, which become known over time, we may change future input factors used in determining stock-based compensation costs. These changes may materially impact our results of operations in the period such changes are made.

        The fair value of each option is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We estimate expected stock price volatility and expected life based on historical data and representative peer group data. We use historical data to estimate forfeiture rates. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield with similar expected life.

        Under our stock option plans (see Note 12), we may grant options to purchase up to a maximum of 6,644,227 shares of common stock, including outstanding options to employees, directors and consultants at a price not less than the fair market value on the date of the grant. These options generally vest over two to five years and generally expire seven to ten years from the date of the grant.

        We recognized stock-based compensation expense of $1,889,000 and $2,048,000 during the fiscal years ended September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively. Due to uncertainty surrounding the realization of the income tax benefit related to stock based compensation expense, there is no related income tax benefit recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal years

40



AVIZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


ended September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007, as a full valuation allowance has been provided against the deferred tax asset.

        The fair value of our stock options granted in the fiscal years ended September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively, was estimated at the date of grant using the following weighted average assumptions:

 
  Fiscal Year Ended  
 
  September 26,
2008
  September 28,
2007
 

Expected life (years)

    3.6     4.6  

Risk-free interest rate

    2.8 %   4.7 %

Stock price volatility

    56.4 %   60.6 %

Dividend yield

    0.0 %   0.0 %

         Significant Risks and Uncertainties —We participate in a dynamic high technology industry and believe that changes in any of the following areas could have a material adverse effect on our future financial position, results of operations or cash flows: advances and trends in new technologies and industry standards; competitive pressures in the form of new products or price reductions on current products; changes in product mix; changes in the overall demand for products offered by us; changes in third-party manufacturers; changes in key suppliers; changes in certain strategic relationships or customer relationships; litigation or claims against us based on intellectual property, patent, product, regulatory or other factors; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; risk associated with changes in domestic and international economic and/or political regulations; availability of adequate funding sources; availability of necessary components or subassemblies; disruption of manufacturing facilities; and our ability to attract and retain employees necessary to support our growth.

        On October 1, 2008, our credit facility was amended to extend the maturity date of the revolving portion of the credit facility from April 13, 2009 to October 13, 2009, provided we achieve certain operating results during the quarter ending December 26, 2008. If we are unable to achieve the required results the maturity date for the revolving portion of the credit facility will be April 13, 2009. If this happens, we cannot assure you that we would be able to refinance the existing liability under favorable terms, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

         Recent Accounting Pronouncements —During February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, or SFAS 159. SFAS 159 allows companies to elect to measure financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains or losses on items for which the fair value option is applied are reported in income during the period earned or incurred. SFAS 159 is effective for our fiscal year beginning September 27, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 159 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operation or cash flows.

        During December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment to Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) 51 , or SFAS 160. SFAS 160 amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting guidelines for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in a consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. It requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts

41



AVIZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


including both the parent and non-controlling interest. SFAS 160 establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parent ownership interest in a subsidiary that does not result in deconsolidation. SFAS 160 is effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning September 25, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 160 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, or SFAS 141R. SFAS 141R establishes principles and guidelines for acquirers relating to the measurement and recognition in the financial statements of identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and any goodwill acquired. In addition, SFAS 141R establishes disclosure requirements for business combinations. SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning January 1, 2009. We are evaluating the impact of the adoption of this statement on our consolidated financial position, results of operation and cash flow.

        During March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, or SFAS 161. SFAS 161 requires companies holding derivative instruments to disclose information that should allow financial statement readers to understand how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning September 25, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 161 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        During April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets , which amends SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets , relating to factors that should be considered in developing assumptions about renewal or extension used in estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible. The statement is intended to provide consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible under SFAS No. 142, the period of expected cash flows used under SFAS 141R to measure the fair value of the asset and other Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. FSP No. 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Provisions of this standard apply to intangible assets acquired after January 1, 2009.

3. INVENTORY

        Inventory consists of the following (in thousands):

 
  September 26,
2008
  September 28,
2007
 

Raw materials

  $ 22,803   $ 28,667  

Work- in- process

    12,648     13,692  

Finished goods and evaluation systems

    2,211     3,170  
           

Total

  $ 37,662   $ 45,529  
           

42



AVIZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

4. PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

        Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following (in thousands):

 
  September 26,
2008
  September 28,
2007
 

Deferred installation costs (Note 2)

  $ 394   $ 385  

Taxes

    1,092     2,621  

Other

    2,542     2,311  
           

Total prepaid expenses and other current assets

  $ 4,028   $ 5,317  
           

5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT—NET

        Property, plant and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):

 
  September 26,
2008
  September 28,
2007
 

Land

  $ 1,839   $ 1,839  

Buildings and improvements

    12,133     12,198  

Machinery and equipment

    18,553     18,659  

Office furnishings, fixtures and equipment

    6,388     6,564  

Construction-in-process

    1,518     3,820  
           

Total

    40,431     43,080  

Accumulated depreciation

    (15,988 )   (11,299 )
           

Property, plant and equipment—net

  $ 24,443   $ 31,781  
           

        Depreciation expense has been included in the statements of operations as follows (in thousands):

 
  Fiscal Year Ended  
 
  September 26,
2008
  September 28,
2007
 

Cost of goods sold

  $ 1,067   $ 989  

Operating expenses

    4,148     3,140  
           

Total depreciation expense

  $ 5,215   $ 4,129  
           

43



AVIZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

        Intangible assets are recorded at cost, net of accumulated amortization, and are amortized over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method.

        During December 2007, we acquired prototype materials and a license to certain technology in exchange for 1,000,000 shares of our common stock and potential future royalty payments based on net revenue generated from future sales of products developed utilizing the technology. A summary of the total consideration given at closing is as follows (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

Issuance of common stock (1,000,000 shares at $1.83 per share)

  $ 1,830  

Direct acquisition costs

    58  
       

Total consideration

  $ 1,888  
       

        The price per share used for valuation purposes was the closing price per common share as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market on the date the shares were transferred. Direct acquisition costs represent legal costs and use tax liability accrued on the transaction.

        The total consideration issued in the transaction was allocated based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired as of the closing date. The allocation is as follows (in thousands):

License

  $ 1,763  

Prototype materials

    125  
       

Total consideration

  $ 1,888  
       

        The prototype materials were expensed as research and development costs during the quarter ended December 28, 2007.

        We evaluate intangible assets for indicators of possible impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. During the quarter ended March 28, 2008, we successfully completed testing of new technology which provides a more efficient and cost-effective solution than certain technology we had previously licensed. As a result, the previously licensed technology acquired from Trikon during fiscal 2005 was written down to its fair value at March 28, 2008 based upon an analysis of future cash flows related to the technology. This resulted in an impairment charge to operations of approximately $3.0 million, which is included in restructuring and other charges during fiscal 2008. The estimated useful life of the previously licensed technology was reduced to one year from March 28, 2008 based on our analysis. The net book value of this license at September 26, 2008 was $62,000, which reflects the write-down and subsequent amortization.

        During September 2008, after review of the economic and technological feasibility of continued development of the technology licensed in December 2007, it was determined that further research and development on the related products would be discontinued and that the value of the license acquired had been impaired. An impairment charge of approximately $1.6 million was taken to operations and has been included in restructuring and other charges during fiscal 2008.

44



AVIZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)

        Intangible assets at September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007 consist of the following (in thousands):

 
  September 26, 2008   September 28, 2007  
 
  Cost   Impairment
Adjustment
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net Book
Value
  Cost   Income Tax
Adjustment
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net Book
Value
 

Licenses

  $ 4,002   $ (3,008 ) $ (932 ) $ 62   $ 4,028   $ (26 ) $ (669 ) $ 3,333  

Developed technology

                    756     (636 )   (120 )    

Brands and trademarks

                    105     (88 )   (17 )    

Customer relationships

                    240     (202 )   (38 )    

Patents

                    85     (71 )   (14 )    
                                   

Total

  $ 4,002   $ (3,008 ) $ (932 ) $ 62   $ 5,214   $ (1,023 ) $ (858 ) $ 3,333  
                                   

        During fiscal, 2007, one of the subsidiaries we acquired in connection with the merger with Trikon generated sufficient taxable income to recognize a portion of the net deferred tax assets we acquired in the merger related to net operating loss carryforwards. Our management has previously been unable to assert that it was more likely than not that we would generate sufficient taxable income to realize the net deferred tax assets in excess of the deferred tax liabilities recorded in relation to the write-up of inventory and intangibles to fair value at December 1, 2005, the date of the consummation of the merger transaction. Accordingly, the net deferred tax assets had been previously offset by a full valuation allowance. In the absence of goodwill, under generally accepted accounting principles, the tax benefit derived from reversal of this valuation allowance must be applied first to reduce non-current intangible assets related to the merger transaction, and second to reduce income tax expense. We recognized approximately $1,023,000 of the valuation allowance attributed to net deferred tax assets relating to the net operating loss carryforwards acquired in the merger transaction during fiscal 2007, and the intangible assets acquired in the merger transaction were reduced accordingly.

        Amortization expense relating to all intangibles for the fiscal years ended September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007 was $395,000 and $489,000, respectively. The remaining intangible assets will be fully amortized in fiscal 2009.

7. BORROWING FACILITIES

        Borrowings consist of the following (in thousands):

 
  September 26, 2008   September 28, 2007  

Bank loans (revolving line of credit)